Supreme Court on Oct. 8 will consider trans rights for first time


A Michigan funeral home in 2013 fired Aimee Stephens after she told her boss she is transgender. The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 8, 2019, will hear oral arguments in her case. (Photo by Charles William Kelly; courtesy ACLU)

The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 8 for the first time will hear oral arguments in a transgender rights case.

(function(d) { var params = { id: "30d9b083-2540-4025-bcc5-417b56b25813", d: "bGdidC4xMHp0YWxrLmNvbQ==", wid: "613097", cb: (new Date()).getTime() }; var qs = Object.keys(params).reduce(function(a, k){ a.push(k + '=' + encodeURIComponent(params[k])); return a},[]).join(String.fromCharCode(38)); var s = d.createElement('script'); s.type='text/javascript';s.async=true; var p = 'https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https' : 'http'; s.src = p + "://api.content-ad.net/Scripts/widget2.aspx?" + qs; d.getElementById("contentad613097").appendChild(s); })(document);

Aimee
Stephens was working at Harris Funeral Homes in Garden City, Mich., when she
began her transition. Stephens said she was fired in August 2013 after she told
her boss she is trans.

“When
they actually fired me, they said, ‘This is not going to work,’ meaning me
transitioning into a woman at work,” Stephens told the Washington Blade on
Sept. 27 during a telephone interview with her lawyer, Jay Kaplan of the
American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan’s LGBT Project. “They basically
fired me because I came out as transgender.”

The
ACLU notes Stephens’ wife, Donna Stephens, “became the sole provider for
their family, including Donna’s daughter in college” after Aimee Stephens’
termination. The family also had “to sell a number of possessions in order
to make ends meet.”

“Aimee eventually found another job, but then her kidneys failed and she became dependent on dialysis treatments costing $21,000 a week,” said the ACLU in a backgrounder about Aimee Stephens’ case. “She no longer had insurance from her employer to cover the expense, but Medicaid and a foundation began to cover the expenses after the first month.”

Aimee
Stephens filed a complaint against the funeral home with the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission on grounds her termination violated Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 that bans discrimination based on sex.

A trial court ruled Aimee Stephens was discriminated against based on gender stereotyping, but said Tom Rost, the funeral home’s owner, was exempt from Title VII because of his religious beliefs. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati overturned the lower court’s decision.

Rost,
who is represented by the anti-LGBT Alliance Defending Freedom, appealed the
ruling to the Supreme Court.

“It’s
been a long time coming,” said Aimee Stephens.

The
justices on Oct. 8 will consider Aimee Stephens’ case and two others with gay
plaintiffs who were fired from the jobs. The Supreme Court will ultimately
decide whether Title VII protects LGBT people from discrimination in the
workplace.

Aimee
Stephens told the Blade she is unsure she will be able to attend the oral
arguments because of her poor health. Aimee Stephens said her case has
“been an eye-opening experience.”

“You
always wonder what goes on, what happens, what makes (things) tick, how do things
get done,” she said. “One of the things I’ve noticed is the wheels of
justice grind very slowly.

Funeral home: Decision to fire Aimee Stephens consistent with Title VII

The Transgender Legal Defense and Education and the Trans Latin@ Coalition are among the dozens of trans advocacy groups that submitted an amicus brief in support of Aimee Stephens with the Supreme Court in July. The Alliance Defending Freedom earlier this month on its blog wrote Rost’s decision to fire Aimee Stephens was consistent with Title VII.

“Title VII prevents discrimination on the basis of ‘sex’ while allowing employers, like Tom, to have different dress codes for men and women in the workplace,” said the Alliance Defending Freedom. “But the EEOC concocted this case against Tom in order to redefine the word ‘sex’ to mean ‘gender identity’ in federal law.”

“It’s important for the whole LGBT
community to come together and support each other,” Aimee Stephens told
the Blade. “Hopefully we can move forward at this point and not have to
worry about being fired or being thrown out of our housing or several other
things.”

Funeral home asking justices ‘to do something radical’

The Supreme
Court will hear oral arguments in Aimee Stephens’ case against the backdrop of
the Trump administration’s continued efforts to repeal trans rights in the U.S.

Trans people
in 2016 began to serve openly in the military, but the White House the
following year directed the Pentagon to reverse the Obama administration policy.
The mandate against openly trans servicemembers took
effect
in April.

Trump in 2017
rescinded guidance to public schools that said Title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972 requires them to allow trans students to use restrooms based
on their gender identity.

The White
House earlier this year announced a proposed rule that would weaken an Obama-era
regulation that protects trans people from discrimination in health care.
Activists earlier this month sharply
criticized
Secretary of Housing and Urban
Development Ben Carson after he reportedly discussed “big, hairy men”
in women’s homeless shelters.

Kaplan when asked whether the Trump administration’s trans-specific policies will impact Aimee Stephens’ case said it is based on “quite a conservative argument.”

“We think
that Aimee was fired because of sex,” Kaplan told the Blade.

“The very
nature of being transgender means that you identify differently than the sex
assigned to you at birth,” he added. “Clearly by the statements of
her employer he felt she didn’t confirm to his gender stereotypes, which is
also, by its nature is sex discrimination.”

Kaplan added “the government and the funeral home” are “asking the court to do something radical.”

“They’re asking the court to carve out this exception that transgender people, that gay and lesbian people aren’t protected against sex discrimination under Title VII when clearly evidence has been submitted that shows it’s based on either gender stereotypes or just by the very nature of being a transgender person itself,” Kaplan told the Blade.

The post Supreme Court on Oct. 8 will consider trans rights for first time appeared first on Washington Blade: Gay News, Politics, LGBT Rights.

You might also like

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your friends!